The debate between organically and conventionally grown continues.
In my previous post, I reviewed the research regarding organic foods and their potential health benefits in comparison to conventionally grown foods.
Today, I want to focus on the safety aspect of organic foods. This topic doesn’t come without controversy and differences in opinion.
Several individuals close within my circle have different viewpoints and beliefs on this topic. And that’s okay. Here at Wholesome, we respect all individual opinions, especially because we can learn something from each viewpoint even if we don’t entirely agree.
An opinion free of all bias is impossible. However, we strive to remove as much bias as possible. How do we do that?
We aim to present the facts — pure, evidence-based facts. Preferably, the research is not performed by a group who has financial interest in either conventional or organically grown foods. Third-party research is ideal. But again, complete freedom from bias is hard to come by.
Let’s dive into the facts.
When individuals were surveyed why they choose organic foods, the most common answer was related to safety. (1) Specifically, those who were concerned about safety contemplated the following issues when it came to their foods:
Let’s break down each of these concerns.
Multidrug Bacteria Resistance
Multidrug bacteria resistance is when bacteria becomes resistant to more than one antibiotic. Unfortunately, this issue is becoming more common and poses a threat to our health. Why? Infections with resistant bacteria are more difficult to treat and tend to have higher death rates.
So, do organic foods tend to have less multidrug bacteria resistance issues?
Let’s see what the research says. When looking at chicken and pork, research indicates there is a higher risk for contamination of multidrug resistance bacteria in conventionally grown chicken and pork compared to organically grown.
The downside of this research? It has only been properly conducted in meat since antibiotic use in animals is a more regular practice (to help prevent infection of the animals). (2)
Food Poisoning Risk
Unfortunately, we see food poisoning frequently. There seems to be food recalls due to E. coli, salmonella, and campylobacter contamination on a regular basis. As many know, in some situations these issues can be life threatening.
However, research demonstrates there is no difference in risk in bacteria (specifically, salmonella and campylobacter) contamination among organic versus conventional products. (2)
From my experience, pesticide exposure is the most common concern of organic foods.
Much of the research related to the risk of pesticide exposure has been done on individuals who live or work around pesticides. Heartbreakingly so, there is a large body of evidence demonstrating this level of exposure to pesticides increases the risk of several chronic diseases, such as: (3)
While all of us are not consistently exposed to this level of pesticide exposure, it is important to consider whether or not pesticide residue on the foods we consume increase our risk of disease.
The truth is, we don’t really know yet.
At this point in time, the best research we have comes from crossover studies. This is when individuals within the study are exposed (or receive) both treatments. In this case, whether the individuals consumed organic foods or conventional foods. Therefore, individuals consumed conventional foods for a period of time, then switched to organic foods, and back to conventional foods. The researchers then looked at the pesticides within the urine.
This particular study, done in children, showed a significant and dramatic effect of consuming organic foods versus conventional.
Figure 1 demonstrates the amount of MDA (malathion dicarboxylic acid – a type of organophosphorus pesticide) found in the children’s urine. You can see the reduction in exposure when the children were eating an organic diet.
Figure 2, as you can see, shows similar results looking at TCPY (3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol – a type of organophosphorus pesticide).
There are a couple items to note with this.
What Does this All Mean?
We need more research.
We need more large scale, long term studies. But, these studies are tough to do. Just like many nutrition studies there are endless confounding (or influencing) variables. On top of organic or conventional foods, does the individual smoke? Exercise? Eat legumes? Although there are different statistical models that can account for these, the research is still more difficult
As always, we believe it is important for you to make the choice you feel most comfortable with for you and your family.
Many choose to operate under the precautionary principle. Defined as:
“The precautionary principle is a strategy for approaching issues of potential harm when extensive scientific knowledge on the matter is lacking. It emphasizes caution, pausing and review before leaping into new innovations that may prove disastrous.”
In this case, and several nutrition related subjects, extensive scientific knowledge is lacking so you need to approach the issue with your own caution.
As always, the choice is yours.
Here at Wholesome, we simply encourage you to eat more plants — whether they are organic or conventional.
Courses & Programs
Disease to Wellness Toolkit
5-Day Plant-Based Meal Plan
Subscribe To Newsletter
Join our newsletter to be notified when courses are open and get freebies from the Wholesome team.
Press & Media
Disease to Wellness Group Program
Disease to Wellness Mentorship